MANSI BHAMBRI / Dehradun
Experts and other citizens have expressed mixed opinions regarding the establishment of the National Commission for Men in India. This varied response follows the introduction of the National Commission for Men Bill 2025 in the Rajya Sabha by a Member of Parliament. Significantly, this marks the first major legislative effort to create a statutory body focused on addressing issues affecting men in India. Experts from various fields and others have shared varied opinions with some stressing the necessity of a National Commission for Men and others expressing different views.
The former director general of police in Uttarakhand and the current vice chancellor of the Sports University of Haryana, Ashok Kumar stated that whether it is for women or men, such commissions are established to provide support. He pointed out that the National Commission for Women was earlier created because women were traditionally considered weaker than men. However, he expressed skepticism about the necessity of a National Commission for Men, stating, “Instead of establishing a National Commission for Men, there is a need to prevent the misuse of special laws designed for the protection of women.”
Kumar said that special laws meant to protect women, including those related to dowry and rape are sometimes misused. He argued that if authorities were to implement punitive measures against women who misuse these laws, the issues men face would automatically decrease. He suggested that this should be prioritised and if provisions for punishment against misuse are enacted, then there is no need for a National Commission for Men.
Sharing his views, clinical psychologist Dr Mukul Sharma cited a survey conducted by the International Institute of Psychometric Counselling, of which he is the founding president, indicating that 92 per cent of young men informed that they wish to preserve the relationship. However, when disputes arise and they approach the women’s commission, women’s helpline or a private counsellor, their concerns are acknowledged but not accepted, with the women’s perspectives typically taking precedence, leaving men feeling pressured. He observed that existing laws tend to be for women and were made earlier. According to him, the voices of men have often been ignored. He believes that to address the issue of men being falsely accused in domestic cases, the establishment of a National Commission for Men is necessary and would likely be effective.
Among local residents too, some have stressed the establishment of the National Commission for Men. Vinod Sahni (name changed) emphasised the urgent need for a National Commission for Men, stating that there is currently no authority that listens to men’s problems. He recounted his own divorce experience explaining that the real issue was a lack of understanding between him and his wife. However, in the legal context, his wife portrayed him negatively and filed allegations against him for dowry. He urged the establishment of special laws, alongside a National Commission for Men, for support.
