MANSI BHAMBRI/Dehradun
Many women from the Jaunsari community have questioned the logic behind a recent decision made by the Gram Sabhas of Kandar and Idroli villages in the tribal dominated area of Jaunsar-Bawar in Dehradun district. The decision restricts women from wearing more than three items of gold jewellery- a Mangalsutra, a nose ring and earrings during weddings and other social functions, with a fine of Rs 50,000 for non-compliance. This choice, made with village consensus, aims to curb ostentation and promote equality. However, women of the community believe that this approach may not be the best way to achieve equality. They suggest focusing on education, respect and other essential aspects rather than restricting personal choices. They also warned against other village Panchayats adopting similar measures.
Chakrata native writer Sunita Chauhan, currently residing in Dehradun expressed dissatisfaction with the decision to limit women’s gold jewellery. She stated that such decisions are unacceptable and should not be followed by other Panchayats in Chakrata, as they send a negative message to society. She argued that if limiting gold jewellery is considered a path to equality, then that notion is misguided. Instead of working towards equality through such restrictions, officials should address other factors that contribute to show off and other aspects like alcohol consumption and the ritual slaughter of goats.
“This decision made by the village officials is purportedly to promote social benefits, which are supposedly linked to equality and reducing displays of wealth. However, I believe this decision is wrong and places undue pressure on women to comply. The matter of wearing jewellery is a personal choice and there should be no interference in this regard. If we talk about equality, then activities related to men in the village should also be scrutinised, rather than placing restrictions solely on women’s gold jewellery, which is a form of investment,” said a resident of Lakhamandal in Chakrata.
A block Panchayat member from Koti, Urmila Chauhan, echoed similar dissatisfaction regarding the decision. She emphasised that gold jewellery is not merely for show; it can be crucial in times of emergency. Chauhan argued that instead of making decisions that primarily affect women, the focus should also include activities related to men, such as controlling alcohol consumption and other social issues. She stressed that such initiatives should not be emulated by other panchayat members in different villages. Instead, they should prioritise equality through education, respect and other meaningful measures.
